The Atlantic fell right into the trap. Jeffrey Goldberg has just enabled Donald Trump to whisk his way into the White House. I will bet the Zionist wordsmith has no idea what he did when he proclaimed “It’s Official: Hillary Clinton Is Running Against Vladimir Putin”. Don’t worry Jeff, I am about to explain it to you.
Before I explain how Donald Trump will be the next US president on account of Goldberg, let me bring you up to speed on the conduit of Trump (and Putin) success.
The Atlantic is owned by David G. Bradley, and the Atlantic publishes what David wants. What David wants more than anything else in the world is for his financial clients to be happy. You see David founded and sold a company now known as CEB (formerly the Corporate Executive Board). The self professed “neocon” is not a high profile celebrity Bill or Hillary Clinton is, but associations with thousands of corporations, along with half a billion in personal wealth make their mark. Why David is even on the Council of Foreign Relations. As for David’s politics and ideals, one only need look as far as an organization called “New America” to discover.
Good Old America: Just Not Good Enough
New America, where Bradley is a member of the board, is headed up by Anne-Marie Slaughter. This distinguished lady was the US State Department’s Director of Policy Planning under Hillary Clinton, the first woman to ever hold the position. New America. I won’t insult my reader’s intelligence by explaining what kind of new United States these people would form. This is abundantly clear, as are their connections. Here is who funds the initiative to create our “New America” with donations of $1 million dollars or more:
- Aphorism Foundation
- Arizona State University
- Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
- Ford Foundation
- William and Flora Hewlett Foundation
- Lumina Foundation
- Eric and Wendy Schmidt
- Jennifer and Jonathan Allan Soros Foundation
If there are any questions, please submit them in the comments. Now let’s move on.
Now I want to scare the hell out of my fellow Americans. Hillary Clinton, the people behind her, are already laying the groundwork for the biggest rip-off of citizens of a country, the Earth has ever witnessed. Sounds conspiratorial, doesn’t it? Well, right now the future Clinton Administration staffing is being prepared. If you thought Barack Obama lined his administration with Wall Street blood suckers, Hillary’s regime will be packed with all-stars of corporate thievery. I won’t run you through the roster here, but imagine this election as a test, a test of just how far the American people have sunk into the Kool-Aid pitcher. All those high financial society supporters drooling over the first ever female president, they are not just in love with Mrs. Clinton’s latest hairstyle. By God, in case you don’t know it yet, this is that infamous New World Order (NWO). The next 4 years will be Obama on known as ecstasy (E). But you are already split 50-50, minds almost made up on either Hillary or Trump. Here’s where Jeffrey Goldberg just won it for Trump, and his running mate Vladimir Putin. You’ll love it.
Be a Man: Vote Trump-Putin
Half of the ladies reading this editorial are going to hate me about one paragraph down from here. Unfortunately for Atlantic readers and writers though, the other half will silently applaud me. A woman as president of the United States is probably a long overdue circumstance. By now the nation should probably have been led by two, or even by three distinguished and capable women. The problem with Hillary Clinton is not that she is female, it’s the species of femininity she exemplifies that is the problem. You will get an idea of what I am driving at reading a Huffington Post article about the real issues in this election, whether or not Hillary is a so-called “ball buster”, for instance. Assuming for a moment Hillary and her pseudo-feminine alliance are all “ball busters”, let’s venture to fantasize about her presidency when she found out a colleague thinks of Clinton like most men do: The Huff Po writer and teacher, Pamela Newton opens our little presidential drama with:
“I bristled recently when a guy I know — a generally progressive, liberal-minded kind of fellow — said that Hillary Clinton was “kind of a Margaret Thatcher. “ When I asked him to elaborate, he said, “Well, she’s a bit of a ball buster.”
She bristled! Bristling is something I imagine Hillary doing in every dramatic moment as president.
“Hillary bristled at the general when he suggested NATO might not be able to contain the Russian offensive her policies provoked!”
I think, somewhere deep down underneath, that all the real men and half the intelligent women in America shudder at the notion of this woman as Commander in Chief of the most powerful (and expensive) military the world has ever known. And while Hillary’s die hard fans “bristle” at the suggestion she is a crook, liar, or incompetent, evidence abounding, a fan is a fanatic. For the “bristlers” out there, Hillary is that big chance at being woman, and the world hearing the collective roar coming to fruition. Meanwhile, the real feminine watches in astonishment, as a herd moos in unison. Oh my.
I am trying hard now to imagine Vladimir Putin “bristling” over anything. Envisioning Donald Trump all flustered and becoming “stiff with anger or frustration”. My word, Mr. Trump would as soon do a John Wayne swagger impression and tell a French President to FO, as jump up red cheeked and flustered like a primp. For God’s sake, at worst he is an American madman, willing to go down with the ship rather than abandon the semblance of manliness! I told you half the ladies would hate me, but so be it. 99% of the men reading this would rather face a firing squad than be “bristled” at by a psychotic woman president. Now admit it. Clinton as chief executive would be like the worst ever bad mommy incident in your life, the scarring would just keep on delivering.
Mr. Goldberg has delivered us redemption though. Americans admire Vladimir Putin, and not for his three dimensional chess games either. No, Putin is no chauvinist, and neither am I. He is a pragmatic, and Hillary Clinton or anybody like her in the office of the presidency of America is impractical. If we consider the world to be in trouble at all, then putting one of the perpetrators of chaos in ultimate charge, it’s simply madness. But if The Atlantic wants to poll the world on leadership, the results of a Trump-Putin ballot would certainly surprise. But I am skirting the issue a bit here. We are down to brass tacks, as they say. America has a decision to make, and a tantamount one.
Are You a Man or a Mouse?
For those unfamiliar with this old euphemism, it is something people used to say in order to encourage someone to be brave when they are frightened to do something. A vote for Trump-Putin ensures all Americans, and the world, that the United States has not gone completely lily livered pinko crazy. And this is a much needed stabilizing factor. Putting Putin popularity worldwide aside, the real issue here is truth. Is it true that we have subjugated women? Absolutely it is true. Can women perform equally well in leadership roles? Absolutely they can, this is a rhetorical question. Does America need a ball busting extremist who will play the “feminist” card as if in a poker game? Absolutely, not, at least not right now. Now here’s where all the real men, and half the intelligent women still reading this get voting instructions.
“What America needs soon, is a woman acting like a woman running things. We do not need a woman, acting like a man, trying to run things. A man like Trump can do the man role better.” Phil Butler
It was Plato who once classified the supreme nature of truth for humanity, the essence of good, as it were. According to Plato, the natural order of things was inextricably tied to justice, and that notion as it resides in every human. Plato characterized four virtues in particular: “wisdom, courage, temperance, and justice. Other important virtues are fortitude, generosity, self-respect, good temper, and sincerity. In addition to advocating good habits of character, virtue theory holds that we should avoid acquiring bad character traits, or vices, such as cowardice, insensibility, injustice, avarice, and vanity”. (1) The referenced fragment here comes from a book I reviewed recently by Francesca de Bardin entitled; Fighting Global Tyranny: Where Are the Women? The book is very, very smart, a 30 year endeavor by one of the so-called “elites”, about the lacking maternal role in leadership. Using the essence of this work, I will now convince the audience in the ethereal place this story reaches.
Francesca de Bardin will not totally agree with all I have said here. I know I have been a little too “plain” in my paternal prerogative, some will have really “bristled” I assure you. However, the centuries of paternal leadership she outlines in parts of her work, characterize men for what they are; protective, competitive, and very often combative. This is our nature, it is an honest one, and both Putin and Trump exemplify it, albeit Putin’s pragmatism shines more often. Turing to femininity, and leadership roles, de Bardin classifies past and current feminine leadership roles too. She professes the dire need for more feminine influence, and I wholly agree (as Putin himself would). And here is the rub.
Hillary Clinton possess not one of the inherent characteristics of a truly feminine leader. She is combative, competitive, aggressive, and unjust, a kind of tyrant, according to anyone near her who is honest. She wears the clothes, she has the anatomy, but she is essentially acting out a masculine doctrine of behavior. Anyone who interested in finding the truth can see this. She does not even try to hide it. Being a so-called “ball buster” is what female leaders like Clinton think is appropriate. Clinton truly believes America needs “man ideas and modes” carried out by a woman! Think about this.
Are men in the world ready for a woman leading the world like a man? Is this balance? Well, Donald Trump can never be said to be “balanced” in a moderate sense, but at least he is not pretending to be a woman running for president. He may erect a wall in between Mexico and the US! But that would be honest, and it would create jobs. And maybe America needs a wall there? Sure, Trump might be best buddies with Vladimir Putin too! How will that play out, do you think? “The US and Russia agreed today, to scorch the Earth beneath the feet of ISIL, and to hunt down every terrorist on the planet!” Economically, I do not see the down side of America and Russia as pals either. On the “gay” issue, I don’t think fewer LGBT parades is a major issue in our world, do you? Overall, and after all, how much more messed up could electing Trump president be, than electing a Nobel Peace Prize winner who has killed more people than Ronald Reagan, Clinton, and both Bushs combined!
Be a man. Be a woman, and vote for some clarity this time. If you must have a woman for president, then vote for Dr. Jill Stein, she’s the real feminine choice anyhow. Personally, I think men screwed up the world, and it will take women to fix it. So go figure my duality I suggest you read the book mentioned earlier, or this Psychology Today analysis of Barack Obama and the imminently successful Brazilian President Lula da Silva. Read these, and the come back here an argue. Meanwhile, for you real men out there, The Atlantic spelled out your path, go vote Trump.